The development of the internet and its extremely rapid penetration in all aspects of human life implies the idea of technological determinism. This is used to refer to the common assumption that new technologies are the primary cause of major social and historical changes. Working in an industry that offers internet services and being part of persuading customers that this is everything they need in this world for their life to be more efficient, fun, successful and simple. I as well often find myself believing in inevitability of the new media.
Monday, March 29, 2010
Deconstructing Benjamin
Walter Benjamin’s main focus in his published work entitled, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” is that when a piece of artwork is reproduced, that traditional work loses its meaning through the loss of its aura, or authenticity. Benjamin writes that an original piece of artwork’s aura derives from its unique characteristic in being a one of a kind piece. However, when that work is reproduced, the work loses its refined value as an original piece. Benjamin writes, “Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be” For example, if a person were to see a replica of a Monet piece or a Picasso piece, they would not feel the same emotions as they would if they saw the actual piece. Seeing the real piece of artwork is a much greater experience than seeing a reproduction or replica of the work.
The Tyranny of Copyright?
The Tyranny of Copyright suggests that culture is a public right endangered by copyright extensions, and it portrays legal scholars and trial lawyers as creative thinkers who hope to restore the “Jeffersonian” ideal of a “free society” by rolling back or ending the protections now afforded creative work. But the case against copyrights is academic. Creative work is produced by real people working in the real world. The readers of the article should not confuse the length of copyright enjoyed by corporations with the copyright protection granted to freelance creators. Corporations don't create, individuals do and the longer a corporation can extend copyrights produced by employees or obtained from freelancers, the longer it will succeed and try to keep that work out of the public domain.